Discover the thought-provoking book 'Is Whistleblowing a Duty?' that delves into the ethical complexities surrounding whistleblowing in contemporary society. Written by renowned political philosophers Emanuela Ceva and Michele Bocchiola, this essential read examines pivotal cases like Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning, challenging the categorization of whistleblowing as mere dissent. Instead, the authors advocate for viewing whistleblowing as a vital institutional duty, emphasizing the importance of public accountability in organizations. This book offers insight into the moral implications of whistleblowing, making it a must-have for students and scholars interested in applied political theory, political ethics, and professional responsibility. With only 140 pages, it provides a concise yet comprehensive analysis that will stimulate engaging discussions on ethics and integrity within both public and private sectors. The ISBN for this insightful text is 9781509529667, published in 2018 by John Wiley & Sons (UK). Don't miss this opportunity to explore the moral landscapes of whistleblowing — order your copy today! Note: Shipping for this item is free. Please allow up to 6 weeks for delivery. Once your order is placed, it cannot be cancelled. Condition: BRAND NEW.

Note: Shipping for this item is free. Please allow up to 6 weeks for delivery. Once your order is placed, it cannot be cancelled.

Condition: BRAND NEW
ISBN: 9781509529667
Year: 2018
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons (UK)
Pages: 140


Description:


Recent years have seen a number of whistleblowers risk their liberty to expose illegal and corrupt behaviour. Some have heralded their bravery; others see them as traitors. Can there be a moral duty to emulate their example and blow the whistle?


In this book, leading political philosophers Emanuela Ceva and Michele Bocchiola draw on well-known cases, such as those of Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning, to probe the difference between permissible and dutiful whistleblowing. They argue that, insofar as whistleblowing is understood as an individual act of dissent, it falls short of constituting a duty, although it can be praiseworthy. Whistleblowing should, they contend, be seen as an institutional duty, embedded within the organizational practices of public accountability.


This concise book will be invaluable for students and scholars of applied political theory, and political and professional ethics.